Well it's a good policy to watermark images. There are lots of weirdo closet bitches who'll take a pic of a handsome dude and use it as their own.
They're "too pretty" and not "natural"? Like those naturally occurring gay internet profiles found near large deposites of bauxite? It's all a big contrivance, why not look your best?
I think you should stick to the train wrecks, the grasp here is pretty weak.
Well thanks for your suggestion, I'll take it under advisement. Tomorrow, maybe. ;)
I realize this one was subtle, but I never claimed to only aim for the disasters. And don't go gettin all hyper-literal with me about natural and pretty...I'm not talking about his looks (though he *is* pretty), its the "Marlboro Man ad polished look /background" in some of the pics that is tweaking me. Pretty scenery is like puppies and teddy bears when its in every shot. Show me more of the man, less of the art direction. ;)
Yes that's more like it. Also, he needs this book (http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/076456790X/qid=1145221228/sr=8-2/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i2_xgl14/702-4643985-1109602).
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
They're "too pretty" and not "natural"? Like those naturally occurring gay internet profiles found near large deposites of bauxite? It's all a big contrivance, why not look your best?
I think you should stick to the train wrecks, the grasp here is pretty weak.
no subject
I realize this one was subtle, but I never claimed to only aim for the disasters. And don't go gettin all hyper-literal with me about natural and pretty...I'm not talking about his looks (though he *is* pretty), its the "Marlboro Man ad polished look /background" in some of the pics that is tweaking me. Pretty scenery is like puppies and teddy bears when its in every shot. Show me more of the man, less of the art direction. ;)
Is this more like it? :)
Re: Is this more like it? :)