May be too intense for some viewers.
Parental discretion is advised.
At least this guy's pretention is stylish >:)
Page Summary
- (Anonymous) - (no subject)
candb.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Patsy by
- Theme: Clay Deco by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 07:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 07:56 pm (UTC)The problem with the profile is actually that the pics are *too* pretty...none of them feel natural to me - they look like R.E.I. catalog pics or something. That and the reminding us of his screen name on every one - though maybe that's so people won't re-use them, I dunno.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 08:05 pm (UTC)They're "too pretty" and not "natural"? Like those naturally occurring gay internet profiles found near large deposites of bauxite? It's all a big contrivance, why not look your best?
I think you should stick to the train wrecks, the grasp here is pretty weak.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 08:17 pm (UTC)I realize this one was subtle, but I never claimed to only aim for the disasters. And don't go gettin all hyper-literal with me about natural and pretty...I'm not talking about his looks (though he *is* pretty), its the "Marlboro Man ad polished look /background" in some of the pics that is tweaking me. Pretty scenery is like puppies and teddy bears when its in every shot. Show me more of the man, less of the art direction. ;)
Is this more like it? :)
Date: 2006-04-16 08:46 pm (UTC)Re: Is this more like it? :)
Date: 2006-04-16 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 08:23 pm (UTC)This is where I make the obligatory "try doing THAT on Windows" remark...
no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 08:27 pm (UTC)I might take umbrage at the Window slam (get it?!) if I fully understood what you just said. :D
no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 11:26 pm (UTC)